The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Parent5446 ☯ ( msg email) 03:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
According to WP:NSONG "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." <--- One review, one mention of its release and 2 references retaining to the album is not past stub class. I wrote the article two months ago, and it has not received significant coverage in any way shape or form, so per WP:BOLD ive redirected the article. Lets break this down some more, according to WP:N and more importantly, WP:GNG an article is only allowed if the topic has received significant coverage, again, one review is not at all significant coverage, if you think so, you need to re-read WP:N and WP:GNG. "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." All information is covered under Cannibal (EP), so no significant coverage. Please weigh in. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 01:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Stub, "The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article." This is not a detailed meaningful article. You my argue this if you wish, but we should both back off and let other weigh in. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 03:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Keep While it is a small article, it is not a stub and fits in with the notability guidelines and WP:NSONG. It's size is only because it is a promo single, as most other promo singles I've seen are about the same size, if not smaller than this article. -- Cprice1000 talk2me 19:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete I agree with Lakeshade's reasonings.-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 22:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Parent5446 ☯ ( msg email) 03:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
According to WP:NSONG "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." <--- One review, one mention of its release and 2 references retaining to the album is not past stub class. I wrote the article two months ago, and it has not received significant coverage in any way shape or form, so per WP:BOLD ive redirected the article. Lets break this down some more, according to WP:N and more importantly, WP:GNG an article is only allowed if the topic has received significant coverage, again, one review is not at all significant coverage, if you think so, you need to re-read WP:N and WP:GNG. "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." All information is covered under Cannibal (EP), so no significant coverage. Please weigh in. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 01:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Stub, "The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article." This is not a detailed meaningful article. You my argue this if you wish, but we should both back off and let other weigh in. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 03:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Keep While it is a small article, it is not a stub and fits in with the notability guidelines and WP:NSONG. It's size is only because it is a promo single, as most other promo singles I've seen are about the same size, if not smaller than this article. -- Cprice1000 talk2me 19:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete I agree with Lakeshade's reasonings.-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 22:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply