- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Slazure
- Slazure ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A software package that does not pass notability requirements. Tagged as such for almost 2 years with no improvement. Mattg82 ( talk) 18:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I could not find coverage in independent reliable sources. Gulumeemee ( talk) 03:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no sources findable showing any in-depth coverage. Does not meet WP:NSOFT.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Slazure
- Slazure ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A software package that does not pass notability requirements. Tagged as such for almost 2 years with no improvement. Mattg82 ( talk) 18:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I could not find coverage in independent reliable sources. Gulumeemee ( talk) 03:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no sources findable showing any in-depth coverage. Does not meet WP:NSOFT.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.