The result was keep. True, this article has trouble with reliable sources and original research, but the topic is substantially notable with tons and tons of independent press coverage. I have marked the article as unreferenced. I'd encourage anyone with complaints about the article to be bold and add sourcing and remove original research. Alphachimp 15:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The article does not cite any reliable secondary sources, and it doesn't seems to be based on anything but original research. -- Karl Meier 11:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. True, this article has trouble with reliable sources and original research, but the topic is substantially notable with tons and tons of independent press coverage. I have marked the article as unreferenced. I'd encourage anyone with complaints about the article to be bold and add sourcing and remove original research. Alphachimp 15:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The article does not cite any reliable secondary sources, and it doesn't seems to be based on anything but original research. -- Karl Meier 11:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply