- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Slant.co
- Slant.co ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non- notable website, no coverage. I speedied but an IP user removed the tag. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- https://angel.co/slant they also have very notable investors you can see in that profile, with a lot more very notable investors visable if you have an AngelList account and you're also an investor. They are also mentioned here: http://www.brw.com.au/p/entrepreneurs/young_thriving_start_investor_bardia_GFu1KbKoJsfDGfkA8F4yGO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.54.103 ( talk • contribs) 13:48, 20 January 2014
- Reply Having a lot of investors ( even notable ones) doesn't count toward notability on Wikipedia. The first link you gave is a step in the right direction. The second one isn't, it's just a routine listing with a statement by Slant itself. The third one also isn't: it's about an investor, and lists some of his investments a couple of times, including Slant, but says nothing about them. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. I did manage to find another reference at freewaregenius but that combined with the supplied gigaom.com reference does not establish sufficient notability. I cannot find anything else relevant on Google, Google News or Highbeam. Nik the stunned 11:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable web content. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Slant.co
- Slant.co ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non- notable website, no coverage. I speedied but an IP user removed the tag. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- https://angel.co/slant they also have very notable investors you can see in that profile, with a lot more very notable investors visable if you have an AngelList account and you're also an investor. They are also mentioned here: http://www.brw.com.au/p/entrepreneurs/young_thriving_start_investor_bardia_GFu1KbKoJsfDGfkA8F4yGO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.54.103 ( talk • contribs) 13:48, 20 January 2014
- Reply Having a lot of investors ( even notable ones) doesn't count toward notability on Wikipedia. The first link you gave is a step in the right direction. The second one isn't, it's just a routine listing with a statement by Slant itself. The third one also isn't: it's about an investor, and lists some of his investments a couple of times, including Slant, but says nothing about them. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. I did manage to find another reference at freewaregenius but that combined with the supplied gigaom.com reference does not establish sufficient notability. I cannot find anything else relevant on Google, Google News or Highbeam. Nik the stunned 11:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable web content. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.