The result was Delete. Only keep reasons are 1) statement of notability without any actual evidence for it (plus a very bad attempt at intimidation) 2) statement of potential, without again any evidence for this, 3) procedural keep, which I don't agree with, since most opinions in this debate have been about the article, not about the editors, and the debate was highly visible anyway. A lack of reliable sources is a perfectly normal delete reason, and no evidence to the contrary has been provided. The reference added to the artiucle at he last moment was hardly a reliable source, and more importantly did not discuss the character, only indicated who portrayed him in an overview of the cast. (Oh, and the debate has run its full five days, as it did at the time of the previous close). Fram ( talk) 07:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
No reliable third-party sources independent of the subject to justify notability thus failing WP:V Also nominating
These pages do not qualify for inclusion as a result of those issues. If any reliable sources have been found, provide links and cite them on the articles. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 05:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Only keep reasons are 1) statement of notability without any actual evidence for it (plus a very bad attempt at intimidation) 2) statement of potential, without again any evidence for this, 3) procedural keep, which I don't agree with, since most opinions in this debate have been about the article, not about the editors, and the debate was highly visible anyway. A lack of reliable sources is a perfectly normal delete reason, and no evidence to the contrary has been provided. The reference added to the artiucle at he last moment was hardly a reliable source, and more importantly did not discuss the character, only indicated who portrayed him in an overview of the cast. (Oh, and the debate has run its full five days, as it did at the time of the previous close). Fram ( talk) 07:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
No reliable third-party sources independent of the subject to justify notability thus failing WP:V Also nominating
These pages do not qualify for inclusion as a result of those issues. If any reliable sources have been found, provide links and cite them on the articles. — Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 05:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply