The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete.: This page voted "keep" a decade ago, but today, Sky is no longer a notable pornstar. She fails to satisfy the requirements of
WP:Pornbio. She has no major award wins, no Hall of fame inductions, no unique contributions to pornography, and no mainstream popularity.
Redban (
talk)
20:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Wasn't really notable in 2005 either. Fails PORNBIO with only a scene-related award nomination. Lacks significant coverage by reliable sources to pass GNG. All coverage comes from a sex tape story involving a mainstream actor.
• Gene93k (
talk)
14:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per Gene93k's accurate analysis, soundly based in the applicable guidelines. Per
WP:KEEP, "questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination", and boilerplate votes with no real policy/guideline basis should be discounted.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (
talk)
00:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete BLPs require better sources then this. FWIW the award is scene related so doesn't count and subtropicalman always votes keep in porn discussions and never offers a policy based reason.
SpartazHumbug!19:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete.: This page voted "keep" a decade ago, but today, Sky is no longer a notable pornstar. She fails to satisfy the requirements of
WP:Pornbio. She has no major award wins, no Hall of fame inductions, no unique contributions to pornography, and no mainstream popularity.
Redban (
talk)
20:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Wasn't really notable in 2005 either. Fails PORNBIO with only a scene-related award nomination. Lacks significant coverage by reliable sources to pass GNG. All coverage comes from a sex tape story involving a mainstream actor.
• Gene93k (
talk)
14:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per Gene93k's accurate analysis, soundly based in the applicable guidelines. Per
WP:KEEP, "questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination", and boilerplate votes with no real policy/guideline basis should be discounted.
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (
talk)
00:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete BLPs require better sources then this. FWIW the award is scene related so doesn't count and subtropicalman always votes keep in porn discussions and never offers a policy based reason.
SpartazHumbug!19:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.