The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. I don't get this article but the consensus here shows an indication that this discussion should be closed as Speedy Keep. LizRead!Talk! 03:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep as one of the main contributor of the article. There is plenty of independent sources reporting and giving commentary on this series. It have been used to show that a new generation, Alpha, is gaining prominence on the internet. You should explain how the currently references in the article does not demonstrate significant coverage.
Catalk to me! 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per @
Dream Focus. Additionally, "semi popular" is debatable.
SNOW Keep: Poorly formed deletion rationale.
Why? I Ask (
talk) 08:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep The notability concerns on the nomination are not sufficiently substantiated. It's not as self-evidently notable as others state, and the article does have issues and struggles to distinguish trivia from substance. But there's clearly a few mainstream articles from reliable news sources describing it and providing commentary on it as a fixture of online humor for younger generations. That's enough for GNG.
VRXCES (
talk) 09:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Reasoning is flawed.
Ryme071 (
talk) 18:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep The series has half a billion views on the official playlist alone, isn't that notable enough?
Finxx (
talk) 20:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Many of these keep arguments aren't the best and the article is not great either. However, as silly as it is, "Skibidi Toilet" is notable. I feel old just typing that out. There are a few good sources on the topic that are already in the article and its an ongoing popular series that will probably continue to get that coverage. ULPS(
talk •
contribs) 01:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. I don't get this article but the consensus here shows an indication that this discussion should be closed as Speedy Keep. LizRead!Talk! 03:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep as one of the main contributor of the article. There is plenty of independent sources reporting and giving commentary on this series. It have been used to show that a new generation, Alpha, is gaining prominence on the internet. You should explain how the currently references in the article does not demonstrate significant coverage.
Catalk to me! 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per @
Dream Focus. Additionally, "semi popular" is debatable.
SNOW Keep: Poorly formed deletion rationale.
Why? I Ask (
talk) 08:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep The notability concerns on the nomination are not sufficiently substantiated. It's not as self-evidently notable as others state, and the article does have issues and struggles to distinguish trivia from substance. But there's clearly a few mainstream articles from reliable news sources describing it and providing commentary on it as a fixture of online humor for younger generations. That's enough for GNG.
VRXCES (
talk) 09:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Reasoning is flawed.
Ryme071 (
talk) 18:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep The series has half a billion views on the official playlist alone, isn't that notable enough?
Finxx (
talk) 20:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Many of these keep arguments aren't the best and the article is not great either. However, as silly as it is, "Skibidi Toilet" is notable. I feel old just typing that out. There are a few good sources on the topic that are already in the article and its an ongoing popular series that will probably continue to get that coverage. ULPS(
talk •
contribs) 01:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.