- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Sk Makbul Islam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sk Makbul Islam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. KCVelaga ( talk) 12:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 12:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 12:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Fails WP:BASIC RationalPuff ( talk) 16:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Publishing lots of stuff is not sufficient for notability; it needs to have a visible impact, not evident here. Does not appear to pass WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Does not pass notability ctiteria. Also seems like promotional article Kichu🐘 Discuss 11:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know how well Scopus indexes book chapter authors, but I couldn't find anything searching for "Sk", "Sheikh", or "Makbul" Islam. Nothing indicates he meets any other notability criteria either. This just reads like a CV. JoelleJay ( talk) 06:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Sk Makbul Islam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sk Makbul Islam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. KCVelaga ( talk) 12:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 12:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 12:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Fails WP:BASIC RationalPuff ( talk) 16:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Publishing lots of stuff is not sufficient for notability; it needs to have a visible impact, not evident here. Does not appear to pass WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Does not pass notability ctiteria. Also seems like promotional article Kichu🐘 Discuss 11:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know how well Scopus indexes book chapter authors, but I couldn't find anything searching for "Sk", "Sheikh", or "Makbul" Islam. Nothing indicates he meets any other notability criteria either. This just reads like a CV. JoelleJay ( talk) 06:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.