The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Jat people. Also consider
boldly redirecting
before coming to AfD. czar 03:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Does not meet
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG. Persistent issues with many of these clan articles which were created at the start of WP. I took to AfD rather than prod in case I was missing anything because sources may be in Indian languages which I wouldn't be able to read.
Boleyn (
talk) 06:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Note I don't think
WP:ORG applies to ethnic groups.
Uanfala (
talk) 18:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Possibly Merge to
Jat I couldn't find anything but this page
[1]. There seem to be some sources but they would need to be verified. Overall it seems to be a subgroup of Jat.
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 12:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
*Make and Redirect to a general Jat clans list There was a suggestion like this and I really liked the sound of it. There exist some vague sources for these clans in the above Wiki I found.
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 13:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Rescinding my vote: it was pointed out the Jat Wiki's sources are unusable. It might be best to delete and then redirect to
Jat.
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 03:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Jat people. Also consider
boldly redirecting
before coming to AfD. czar 03:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Does not meet
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG. Persistent issues with many of these clan articles which were created at the start of WP. I took to AfD rather than prod in case I was missing anything because sources may be in Indian languages which I wouldn't be able to read.
Boleyn (
talk) 06:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Note I don't think
WP:ORG applies to ethnic groups.
Uanfala (
talk) 18:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Possibly Merge to
Jat I couldn't find anything but this page
[1]. There seem to be some sources but they would need to be verified. Overall it seems to be a subgroup of Jat.
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 12:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
*Make and Redirect to a general Jat clans list There was a suggestion like this and I really liked the sound of it. There exist some vague sources for these clans in the above Wiki I found.
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 13:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Rescinding my vote: it was pointed out the Jat Wiki's sources are unusable. It might be best to delete and then redirect to
Jat.
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 03:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.