- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 10:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Sings Songs From The Wiz
- Sings Songs From The Wiz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reads like an essay, not immediately obvious what it's about, mostly WP:OR JMHamo ( talk) 00:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Unreferenced essay, and the topic is ill-defined and not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The topic is clearly this one about a "lost" Diana Ross album released a couple of days ago. The original album was produced by Quincy Jones and featured songs written by Luther Vandross among others. I'll do a bit more digging around after I've had some more sleep, but I'd be amazed if that didn't meet WP:GNG. Valenciano ( talk) 01:06, 29 November 2015
(UTC)
- Delete Why are we talking about notability? The article is solid spam for the newly released album, complete with pointers to where you can buy it. It would need a complete rewrite to be acceptable, and I would have speedied if it hadn't been brought here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- The answer to your first question is at WP:BEFORE: "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD." Valenciano ( talk) 11:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep following rewrite. The initial article was crap, but it's about a notable, recently released "lost" Diana Ross album, which meets criteria 1 and 5 of WP:NALBUM, as the album has been featured in the Wall Street Journal and Playbill among others. As the film which inspired it was notable, it's more than likely that there are other, offline sources. Valenciano ( talk) 11:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Don't even know why this is being even considered for deletion. Its an album and desrves its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etrata93 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment – More source search links below. North America 1000 07:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:NALBUMS points #1 and 5. Also keep per WP:HEY; the article was entirely rewritten after being nominated for deletion. Source examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. North America 1000 07:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 10:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Sings Songs From The Wiz
- Sings Songs From The Wiz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reads like an essay, not immediately obvious what it's about, mostly WP:OR JMHamo ( talk) 00:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Unreferenced essay, and the topic is ill-defined and not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The topic is clearly this one about a "lost" Diana Ross album released a couple of days ago. The original album was produced by Quincy Jones and featured songs written by Luther Vandross among others. I'll do a bit more digging around after I've had some more sleep, but I'd be amazed if that didn't meet WP:GNG. Valenciano ( talk) 01:06, 29 November 2015
(UTC)
- Delete Why are we talking about notability? The article is solid spam for the newly released album, complete with pointers to where you can buy it. It would need a complete rewrite to be acceptable, and I would have speedied if it hadn't been brought here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- The answer to your first question is at WP:BEFORE: "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD." Valenciano ( talk) 11:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep following rewrite. The initial article was crap, but it's about a notable, recently released "lost" Diana Ross album, which meets criteria 1 and 5 of WP:NALBUM, as the album has been featured in the Wall Street Journal and Playbill among others. As the film which inspired it was notable, it's more than likely that there are other, offline sources. Valenciano ( talk) 11:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Don't even know why this is being even considered for deletion. Its an album and desrves its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etrata93 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment – More source search links below. North America 1000 07:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:NALBUMS points #1 and 5. Also keep per WP:HEY; the article was entirely rewritten after being nominated for deletion. Source examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. North America 1000 07:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.