- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Singapore Medical Group
- Singapore Medical Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
noi notable and promotional, with most of the refs mere notices, and some of them from rather dubious website. Spa, created in mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete Lacks significant coverage to meet GNG or CORP. Very promotional. we need a WP:NOT prospectus to cover this sort of thing. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 18:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete You'd think a 'medical group' would talk more about medical things than their stock performance in their article, but not here. Definitely an WP:ADVERT. Nate • ( chatter) 22:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Singapore Medical Group
- Singapore Medical Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
noi notable and promotional, with most of the refs mere notices, and some of them from rather dubious website. Spa, created in mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete Lacks significant coverage to meet GNG or CORP. Very promotional. we need a WP:NOT prospectus to cover this sort of thing. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 18:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete You'd think a 'medical group' would talk more about medical things than their stock performance in their article, but not here. Definitely an WP:ADVERT. Nate • ( chatter) 22:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.