The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply
This page has been speedy deleted with an eye to an ArbComm case that wasn't closed,
overturned at Deletion Review, and kept at
AFD. While the AFD was open, the
ArbComm case closed, placing this article under a
remedy encouraging but not requiring speedy deletion. It has since been speedy deleted again, and gone to
deletion review again. With no consensus to endorse the speedy deletion, it is overturned and brought back to AFD per
the undeletion policy. So here we are, unfortunately. As part of the deletion review close, the article has been both retitled and cut down about 50%. So while you are encouraged to read the most recent deletion review, and any other desired discussion, many of the concerns are at least partly addressed and the article should be read as it is now before opining again. I don't want any admin to
wheel war over this, and I don't want to see it on deletion review a third time, so please come to a clear consensus. Ideas from the deletion review include 1) deleting it, 2) keeping it 3) merging it to
History of Simon Fraser University, 4) merging it elsehere, and I'm sure you all will have more. Count my listing as a technical nomination.
GRBerry 07:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
Note to closing admin This article has attracted sock-puppets to prior discussions, including the deletion review just closed.
GRBerry 07:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply
This page has been speedy deleted with an eye to an ArbComm case that wasn't closed,
overturned at Deletion Review, and kept at
AFD. While the AFD was open, the
ArbComm case closed, placing this article under a
remedy encouraging but not requiring speedy deletion. It has since been speedy deleted again, and gone to
deletion review again. With no consensus to endorse the speedy deletion, it is overturned and brought back to AFD per
the undeletion policy. So here we are, unfortunately. As part of the deletion review close, the article has been both retitled and cut down about 50%. So while you are encouraged to read the most recent deletion review, and any other desired discussion, many of the concerns are at least partly addressed and the article should be read as it is now before opining again. I don't want any admin to
wheel war over this, and I don't want to see it on deletion review a third time, so please come to a clear consensus. Ideas from the deletion review include 1) deleting it, 2) keeping it 3) merging it to
History of Simon Fraser University, 4) merging it elsehere, and I'm sure you all will have more. Count my listing as a technical nomination.
GRBerry 07:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
reply
Note to closing admin This article has attracted sock-puppets to prior discussions, including the deletion review just closed.
GRBerry 07:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
reply