From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Silvia H. Allred

Silvia H. Allred (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was previously deleted a year ago according to deletion logs and i don't think the subject's notability has changed since that time Josalm64rc ( talk) 05:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply

I get the push to remove this article and I understand the need to keep Wikipedia on target, but I would appeal to a recent article in The New York Times about the gaping disparity in profiles for men versus women. Allred spent five years as the number two leader of an organization of more than 7 million women. She may not have yielded the appropriate press coverage, but we start to get into a chicken-and-the-egg scenario where Wikipedia can improve exposure to garner more coverage. Allred is a woman, a person of color, and from a small nation. Whatever your eye-rolling thoughts of people of her religion, I think a well-written and arguably sourced article might move Wikipedia in the right direction. Please forgive my inexperience with Wikipedia--I'm still learning. Fullrabb ( talk) 14:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. As a member of the church pertaining to this article, I understand the push for more coverage. However, as significant coverage does not exist in independent, reliable sources, the individual fails WP:GNG. Rollidan ( talk) 19:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Silvia H. Allred

Silvia H. Allred (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was previously deleted a year ago according to deletion logs and i don't think the subject's notability has changed since that time Josalm64rc ( talk) 05:19, 31 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) reply

I get the push to remove this article and I understand the need to keep Wikipedia on target, but I would appeal to a recent article in The New York Times about the gaping disparity in profiles for men versus women. Allred spent five years as the number two leader of an organization of more than 7 million women. She may not have yielded the appropriate press coverage, but we start to get into a chicken-and-the-egg scenario where Wikipedia can improve exposure to garner more coverage. Allred is a woman, a person of color, and from a small nation. Whatever your eye-rolling thoughts of people of her religion, I think a well-written and arguably sourced article might move Wikipedia in the right direction. Please forgive my inexperience with Wikipedia--I'm still learning. Fullrabb ( talk) 14:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. As a member of the church pertaining to this article, I understand the push for more coverage. However, as significant coverage does not exist in independent, reliable sources, the individual fails WP:GNG. Rollidan ( talk) 19:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook