The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I am the author of the article. We had a long discussion in the German Wiki, about the article and its relevance. I did not want to give up the article and worked on it during the deletion discussion. In the end I got caught in a revision trap and the article was deleted. Now I have revised it (first in english) and published it again. I hope that the article has now more encyclopedic relevance for wikipedia. (a quasi last try!) --
Schnittwerk (
talk)
05:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TOOSOON. One authored book is unlikely to yield
WP:NAUTHOR. I didn't find any book reviews (but searching in German might be more productive); I do find it pretty plausible that the subject will eventually meet that criterion. A 2016 PhD is unlikely to meet
WP:NPROF, and I see no evidence of academic impact as yet.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk)
12:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I don't see the significant independent coverage required to meet
WP:GNG nor does she appear to meet
WP:NAUTHOR. My search in Google Scholar found only 1 article with two citations and there's no evidence she meets any criteria at
WP:NPROF.
Papaursa (
talk)
04:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I am the author of the article. We had a long discussion in the German Wiki, about the article and its relevance. I did not want to give up the article and worked on it during the deletion discussion. In the end I got caught in a revision trap and the article was deleted. Now I have revised it (first in english) and published it again. I hope that the article has now more encyclopedic relevance for wikipedia. (a quasi last try!) --
Schnittwerk (
talk)
05:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TOOSOON. One authored book is unlikely to yield
WP:NAUTHOR. I didn't find any book reviews (but searching in German might be more productive); I do find it pretty plausible that the subject will eventually meet that criterion. A 2016 PhD is unlikely to meet
WP:NPROF, and I see no evidence of academic impact as yet.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk)
12:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I don't see the significant independent coverage required to meet
WP:GNG nor does she appear to meet
WP:NAUTHOR. My search in Google Scholar found only 1 article with two citations and there's no evidence she meets any criteria at
WP:NPROF.
Papaursa (
talk)
04:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.