- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Signature Taunt
- Signature Taunt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A rather useless content fork of Taunting, and really adds nothing to the understanding of that topic ES &L 11:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- delete nosense and no notable. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 12:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 21:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Useless is a pretty accurate word to describe this. Everything we need to know about taunting is already in Taunting. LM2000 ( talk) 02:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete It is almost a direct copy of Taunting - not sure what the point is but clearly a recently created article covering an existing topic. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless content fork of Taunting. jni ( talk) 12:37, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Previous comments have nailed it. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Signature Taunt
- Signature Taunt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A rather useless content fork of Taunting, and really adds nothing to the understanding of that topic ES &L 11:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- delete nosense and no notable. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 12:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse ( talk) 21:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Useless is a pretty accurate word to describe this. Everything we need to know about taunting is already in Taunting. LM2000 ( talk) 02:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete It is almost a direct copy of Taunting - not sure what the point is but clearly a recently created article covering an existing topic. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless content fork of Taunting. jni ( talk) 12:37, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Previous comments have nailed it. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.