- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Sigma File Manager
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sigma File Manager ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources and no claim of notability. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. A WP:BEFORE search shows no coverage in reliable sources at all. Laplorfill ( talk) 06:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Laplorfill ( talk) 06:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The development of the current application has just begun (less than a week) and of course, it'll take further time for someone to collect more references and to update the contents related to it. Time and patience plays an important role in improving Wikipedia articles, and many Wikipedians among us will accept this.
Utkarsh Nayan Gupta (
talk) 01:41, 29 May 2021 (IST)
- Hello, article creator. Just saying, but if we need "time and patience" for something to be notable, it's probably not notable, and if it is or will be, well, we don't know that. Check out WP:CRYSTAL: don't just guess and say "hey, maybe this brand new random program on GitHub no one has ever heard of with the poorly-written article is notable enough to stay!" Because it probably isn't. AdoTang ( talk) 19:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete GitHub and other repositories are not WP:RS. Ratnahastin talk 07:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. The application was released a little over a week ago and I cannot find any coverage of it in reliable sources. It may become notable in the future but right now it is too soon for an article. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 06:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Lord Bolingbroke. Nothing else to say, other than that a rather promotional article being created seconds after a program's release might say something about COI. AdoTang ( talk) 19:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Sigma File Manager
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sigma File Manager ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources and no claim of notability. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. A WP:BEFORE search shows no coverage in reliable sources at all. Laplorfill ( talk) 06:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Laplorfill ( talk) 06:13, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: The development of the current application has just begun (less than a week) and of course, it'll take further time for someone to collect more references and to update the contents related to it. Time and patience plays an important role in improving Wikipedia articles, and many Wikipedians among us will accept this.
Utkarsh Nayan Gupta (
talk) 01:41, 29 May 2021 (IST)
- Hello, article creator. Just saying, but if we need "time and patience" for something to be notable, it's probably not notable, and if it is or will be, well, we don't know that. Check out WP:CRYSTAL: don't just guess and say "hey, maybe this brand new random program on GitHub no one has ever heard of with the poorly-written article is notable enough to stay!" Because it probably isn't. AdoTang ( talk) 19:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete GitHub and other repositories are not WP:RS. Ratnahastin talk 07:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. The application was released a little over a week ago and I cannot find any coverage of it in reliable sources. It may become notable in the future but right now it is too soon for an article. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 06:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Lord Bolingbroke. Nothing else to say, other than that a rather promotional article being created seconds after a program's release might say something about COI. AdoTang ( talk) 19:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.