The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article lacks general notability, as there are no cited sources specifically mentioning the Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) or providing significant coverage of this conflict. Instead, it focuses more on unrelated events such as the other conquests of Sher Shah and the Battle of Harmoda (1557). While some sources briefly mention Sher Shah's attention towards Mewar in 1544, there is no substantial coverage of a proper siege of Chittorgarh in these sources. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 05:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[2]
Pg.181
[3]
Pg.A53
[4]
Pg-529
[5]
Pg.76
[6]
This article neither contains any unreliable source nor dealing with any unrelated topics.Battle of Harmoda,As mentioned above is completely related to the topic.The commander Haji khan and Shams khan were left by Sher shah to face the Udai singh that must be mentioned and the aftermath should also being mentioned.
Kemilliogolgi (
talk) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) —
Kemilliogolgi (
talk ·
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
AdityaNakul (
talk ·
contribs).
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 15:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
When Sher Shah Suri was within a mere distance of 12 Kos from Chittor, Udai Singh II made the decision to surrender the fort without engaging in a direct confrontation.This is not what we call WP:SIGCOV. There's no significant engagement, so we can't carve out an article which only has 2-3 lines of non-engagement "Siege of Chittor". And I have checked and thoroughly reviewed the sources, out of 14 only 3 deals with this meagre siege and the rest focuses on other unrelated events. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 17:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two dramatically different interpretations of this article, we need more participants here to come to a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article lacks general notability, as there are no cited sources specifically mentioning the Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) or providing significant coverage of this conflict. Instead, it focuses more on unrelated events such as the other conquests of Sher Shah and the Battle of Harmoda (1557). While some sources briefly mention Sher Shah's attention towards Mewar in 1544, there is no substantial coverage of a proper siege of Chittorgarh in these sources. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 05:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[2]
Pg.181
[3]
Pg.A53
[4]
Pg-529
[5]
Pg.76
[6]
This article neither contains any unreliable source nor dealing with any unrelated topics.Battle of Harmoda,As mentioned above is completely related to the topic.The commander Haji khan and Shams khan were left by Sher shah to face the Udai singh that must be mentioned and the aftermath should also being mentioned.
Kemilliogolgi (
talk) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) —
Kemilliogolgi (
talk ·
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
AdityaNakul (
talk ·
contribs).
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 15:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
When Sher Shah Suri was within a mere distance of 12 Kos from Chittor, Udai Singh II made the decision to surrender the fort without engaging in a direct confrontation.This is not what we call WP:SIGCOV. There's no significant engagement, so we can't carve out an article which only has 2-3 lines of non-engagement "Siege of Chittor". And I have checked and thoroughly reviewed the sources, out of 14 only 3 deals with this meagre siege and the rest focuses on other unrelated events. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 17:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two dramatically different interpretations of this article, we need more participants here to come to a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)