- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 15:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Shiyaling station
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shiyaling station ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG. Onel5969 TT me 15:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China. Shellwood ( talk) 15:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I've added additional sources that focus on this station. Now meets WP:GNG. Plus, it does not make sense to redirect an interchange station to a single line article - it makes sense for interchange stations to have their own articles to aid navigation, if nothing else. Garuda3 ( talk) 18:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - additional sourcing consists of a source of dubious reliability and a press release. The first appears to be another press release as well. Onel5969 TT me 01:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. In addition to the five sources currently cited in the article, a quick search found several others, which I think demonstrate notability: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. I suspect a more thorough search would find even more. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 15:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Sufficient sourcing available to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 15:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Shiyaling station
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shiyaling station ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG. Onel5969 TT me 15:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China. Shellwood ( talk) 15:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I've added additional sources that focus on this station. Now meets WP:GNG. Plus, it does not make sense to redirect an interchange station to a single line article - it makes sense for interchange stations to have their own articles to aid navigation, if nothing else. Garuda3 ( talk) 18:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - additional sourcing consists of a source of dubious reliability and a press release. The first appears to be another press release as well. Onel5969 TT me 01:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. In addition to the five sources currently cited in the article, a quick search found several others, which I think demonstrate notability: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. I suspect a more thorough search would find even more. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 15:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Sufficient sourcing available to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.