- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Shields Junction
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shields Junction ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page, in my view, fails WP:GNG as a junction, rather than a physical station/depot etc. Most of the page talks about the Glasgow Airport Rail Link, which already has its own page. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 05:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Scotland. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 05:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed per community census that not all rail stations (or junctions) are notable Mr.weedle ( talk) 05:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst ( talk) 17:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete/Redirect No independent notability outside that of the individual lines which meet at this junction. I would not oppose a redirect to Paisley Canal line. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As per Trainsandotherthings. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I've failed to find independent sigcov in my search attempts. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 02:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oh this is cool. Definitely bearing it in mind as a future timesaver. XAM2175 (T) 14:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Shields Junction
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shields Junction ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page, in my view, fails WP:GNG as a junction, rather than a physical station/depot etc. Most of the page talks about the Glasgow Airport Rail Link, which already has its own page. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 05:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Scotland. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 05:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed per community census that not all rail stations (or junctions) are notable Mr.weedle ( talk) 05:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst ( talk) 17:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete/Redirect No independent notability outside that of the individual lines which meet at this junction. I would not oppose a redirect to Paisley Canal line. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As per Trainsandotherthings. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I've failed to find independent sigcov in my search attempts. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 02:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oh this is cool. Definitely bearing it in mind as a future timesaver. XAM2175 (T) 14:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.