The result was Withdraw. MQS convinced me again. Schuym1 ( talk) 02:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 ( talk) 23:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
*Delete nom is right, not inherited, similar to below. Notability requires 3rd party sources, just like any other article and most "sources" I find are blogs and church newsletters. Maybe someday, but not notable at this time.
PHARMBOY (
TALK)
23:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comment on use of the criterion n. The very meaning of the concept for a company is prominence in the profession, which can be shown in various ways.. Producing the films is the evidence for the notability, and the reason for it. Without them, a production company would not be notable. It's not material in newspapers about the company that makes it notable, though that is one kind of evidence for it. But the films show it adequately by themselves. It's easier generally to show notability for the films, but the true notability is the people who make them. If a production company can be notable at all, its by making notable films. Proper use of not inherited would b to say that bcause the company makes some notale films, everything it makes is not notable. DGG ( talk)
The result was Withdraw. MQS convinced me again. Schuym1 ( talk) 02:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 ( talk) 23:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
*Delete nom is right, not inherited, similar to below. Notability requires 3rd party sources, just like any other article and most "sources" I find are blogs and church newsletters. Maybe someday, but not notable at this time.
PHARMBOY (
TALK)
23:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comment on use of the criterion n. The very meaning of the concept for a company is prominence in the profession, which can be shown in various ways.. Producing the films is the evidence for the notability, and the reason for it. Without them, a production company would not be notable. It's not material in newspapers about the company that makes it notable, though that is one kind of evidence for it. But the films show it adequately by themselves. It's easier generally to show notability for the films, but the true notability is the people who make them. If a production company can be notable at all, its by making notable films. Proper use of not inherited would b to say that bcause the company makes some notale films, everything it makes is not notable. DGG ( talk)