The result was Delete and redirect to Wife Swap#Other Special Editions. My reading of the sources here is that almost any notability that Silver might possess is related to Wife Swap, and thus any information on her should be in that article. Turning it around, we could ask the question "would there be any notability whatsoever if this person had not appeared on that program", and the answer, despite a few minor media appearances and the ordinance issue, is clearly "no". Not to mention that there's a clear consensus to delete here. However, since Silver is already mentioned briefly in the WS article, any other encyclopedic information can be mentioned there, as long it does not amount to an attempt to recreate this article via the back door. Black Kite 18:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:N, the bulk of references fails WP:RS. Inclusion of this person in WP is just ridiculous. WP is an encyclopedia, and the most popular one at that, would you include someone like this person in an encylopedia? – Shannon Rose ( talk) 19:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC) reply
*Weak delete A tough call, but I finally decided that the person doesn't meet
notability standards. Owning a private school and appearing on a reality television show doesn't make a person notable enough for inclusion here. 3-rd party sources exist, but there are relatively few.
♪Tempo
di Valse ♪ 20:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Changed to weak keep Thought it over, and decided that there are enough reliable 3-rd party sources for this to qualify as sufficiently
notable.
♪Tempo
di Valse ♪
23:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
reply
WP:CANVAS Ms. Rose, I am a little confused, you accuse the creator of this article of canvassing, by notifying one editor, [10] with what User:AndrewHowse calls a "personal attack":
And yet, you have canvassed 6 editors yourself. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Can you explain this blatant discrepency in your canvassing accusations/personal attacks and your own canvassing? Ikip ( talk) 10:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete and redirect to Wife Swap#Other Special Editions. My reading of the sources here is that almost any notability that Silver might possess is related to Wife Swap, and thus any information on her should be in that article. Turning it around, we could ask the question "would there be any notability whatsoever if this person had not appeared on that program", and the answer, despite a few minor media appearances and the ordinance issue, is clearly "no". Not to mention that there's a clear consensus to delete here. However, since Silver is already mentioned briefly in the WS article, any other encyclopedic information can be mentioned there, as long it does not amount to an attempt to recreate this article via the back door. Black Kite 18:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:N, the bulk of references fails WP:RS. Inclusion of this person in WP is just ridiculous. WP is an encyclopedia, and the most popular one at that, would you include someone like this person in an encylopedia? – Shannon Rose ( talk) 19:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC) reply
*Weak delete A tough call, but I finally decided that the person doesn't meet
notability standards. Owning a private school and appearing on a reality television show doesn't make a person notable enough for inclusion here. 3-rd party sources exist, but there are relatively few.
♪Tempo
di Valse ♪ 20:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Changed to weak keep Thought it over, and decided that there are enough reliable 3-rd party sources for this to qualify as sufficiently
notable.
♪Tempo
di Valse ♪
23:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
reply
WP:CANVAS Ms. Rose, I am a little confused, you accuse the creator of this article of canvassing, by notifying one editor, [10] with what User:AndrewHowse calls a "personal attack":
And yet, you have canvassed 6 editors yourself. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Can you explain this blatant discrepency in your canvassing accusations/personal attacks and your own canvassing? Ikip ( talk) 10:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply