The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.
WP:SNOW. Well done Blofeld and SusunW for the improvements.
I'm not sure of what to do with this one. References could probably be found, but they'd probably be mere notices or promotional--but it would depend how you looked on it. I can see a possible point for including all hotels of this level, or for merging them all in chains. DGG (
talk ) 17:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Prior to Blofeld's recent expansion I could understand the nomination but with the sources now present, it is clearly notable enough.
Miyagawa (
talk) 18:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep clearly meets GNG. Lots of promotional materials about what Qatar Airlines plans to do, which is speculative and promotional right now, but could lead to future expansion. Has been in news for decades as a business conference center, major employer and hospitality center from what I find in the London papers. Though it is a business, historic information that is not promotional is present.
SusunW (
talk) 21:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Major 4-star hotel, article may have originally been poorly written by a PR person, but that's not a reason to delete, that's just a reason to edit the cruft. Looks like the gnomes have gone to work to fix it.
Montanabw(talk) 02:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
It was just my unsourced stub I think haha!♦
Dr. Blofeld 07:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
LOL, see, you could be paid to write that stuff!
Montanabw(talk) 09:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep This article has way too many quotes, but the coverage from where these quotes come from meet notability. I would suggest cutting those and the article would read less like a news blurb and be closer to non-promotional.
Tangledupinbleu chs (
talk) 02:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.
WP:SNOW. Well done Blofeld and SusunW for the improvements.
I'm not sure of what to do with this one. References could probably be found, but they'd probably be mere notices or promotional--but it would depend how you looked on it. I can see a possible point for including all hotels of this level, or for merging them all in chains. DGG (
talk ) 17:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Prior to Blofeld's recent expansion I could understand the nomination but with the sources now present, it is clearly notable enough.
Miyagawa (
talk) 18:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep clearly meets GNG. Lots of promotional materials about what Qatar Airlines plans to do, which is speculative and promotional right now, but could lead to future expansion. Has been in news for decades as a business conference center, major employer and hospitality center from what I find in the London papers. Though it is a business, historic information that is not promotional is present.
SusunW (
talk) 21:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Major 4-star hotel, article may have originally been poorly written by a PR person, but that's not a reason to delete, that's just a reason to edit the cruft. Looks like the gnomes have gone to work to fix it.
Montanabw(talk) 02:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
It was just my unsourced stub I think haha!♦
Dr. Blofeld 07:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
LOL, see, you could be paid to write that stuff!
Montanabw(talk) 09:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep This article has way too many quotes, but the coverage from where these quotes come from meet notability. I would suggest cutting those and the article would read less like a news blurb and be closer to non-promotional.
Tangledupinbleu chs (
talk) 02:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.