The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. The vote by User:Paul the Archivist has been ignored as it is his only contribution ever. — JIP | Talk 13:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This could be a good subject for an article, but as it is it is
original research and the
point of view of the author. Delete under
WP:NOT criteria 1.3: "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought"
JeremyA 04:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
I have reformatted the article and removed all of the review-like elements. With some clean-up and expansion it might make a good article, so I am changing my vote to no vote. If kept, I suggest renaming to either
Pubs in Sheffield or
List of pubs in Sheffield.
JeremyA
03:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. The vote by User:Paul the Archivist has been ignored as it is his only contribution ever. — JIP | Talk 13:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This could be a good subject for an article, but as it is it is
original research and the
point of view of the author. Delete under
WP:NOT criteria 1.3: "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought"
JeremyA 04:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
I have reformatted the article and removed all of the review-like elements. With some clean-up and expansion it might make a good article, so I am changing my vote to no vote. If kept, I suggest renaming to either
Pubs in Sheffield or
List of pubs in Sheffield.
JeremyA
03:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
reply