- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Fellow of the American Physical Society is a clear pass of WP:ACADEMIC#3
Shashi P. Karna
- Shashi P. Karna ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable and improvable as sure this may seem acceptable at first but I question whether it can be better improved, because the best my searches found was this, this and this. Pinging past tagger Ukexpat and also users interested with this subject Primefac, David Eppstein and DGG. SwisterTwister talk 21:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Fellow of the American Physical Society should be enough for WP:PROF#C3, and he also has a plausible case for #C1. Article needs cleanup but not badly enough for WP:TNT. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- speedy keep Fellow APS has always been considered here even by itself sufficient reason for a keep, and this should not even have been nominated. DGG ( talk ) 23:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Fellow of the American Physical Society is a clear pass of WP:ACADEMIC#3
Shashi P. Karna
- Shashi P. Karna ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable and improvable as sure this may seem acceptable at first but I question whether it can be better improved, because the best my searches found was this, this and this. Pinging past tagger Ukexpat and also users interested with this subject Primefac, David Eppstein and DGG. SwisterTwister talk 21:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Fellow of the American Physical Society should be enough for WP:PROF#C3, and he also has a plausible case for #C1. Article needs cleanup but not badly enough for WP:TNT. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- speedy keep Fellow APS has always been considered here even by itself sufficient reason for a keep, and this should not even have been nominated. DGG ( talk ) 23:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.