The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Is it really necessary to have a page of a "shadow office" for which there has only ever been one shadow minister and there is no direct corresponding government minister, but obviously a link/line of sight to DWP? There is little to no mention about what the shadow minister actually does nor has it proven to have gotten WP:SIGCOV in the media, other than pointing out its existence and the Raynor's appointment. General WP:GNG failure too. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Is it really necessary to have a page of a "shadow office" for which there has only ever been one shadow minister and there is no direct corresponding government minister, but obviously a link/line of sight to DWP? There is little to no mention about what the shadow minister actually does nor has it proven to have gotten WP:SIGCOV in the media, other than pointing out its existence and the Raynor's appointment. General WP:GNG failure too. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)