The result was keep. John254 04:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Previously considered at AFD in June 2006 with an outcome of 'keep'; the basis for nomination was that the content could never move beyond being a dictionary definition. In August 2007, article was nominated for deletion by WP:PROD, a technically incorrect action for articles previously considered at AFD; the article appears here to correct this action. The reasoning behind second nomination for deletion was "Wikipedia is not a textbook of quotations from the Qur'an and Hadith. Nor should it contain commentary on the primary sources." User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 04:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 04:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Previously considered at AFD in June 2006 with an outcome of 'keep'; the basis for nomination was that the content could never move beyond being a dictionary definition. In August 2007, article was nominated for deletion by WP:PROD, a technically incorrect action for articles previously considered at AFD; the article appears here to correct this action. The reasoning behind second nomination for deletion was "Wikipedia is not a textbook of quotations from the Qur'an and Hadith. Nor should it contain commentary on the primary sources." User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 04:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC) reply