The result was Speedily deleted as an article about a business that contained no facial showing of notability; Emeraude looked, and found nothing on the web. The article itself was vague, evasive, and buzzwordy, and would have required a total rewrite if kept in any case. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 15:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Spammy article about what seems to me a non-notable company and, indeed, the article makes no assertion of notability. Google search for "Septier Communication"-wikipedia produces 347 returns, but apart from the company's own website these all appear to be directory entries and the like with no third party etc sources. Article was created September 2007 with no development since, by an editor who has edited only this article, plus adding the company name to Positioning (telecommunications). Emeraude ( talk) 17:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as an article about a business that contained no facial showing of notability; Emeraude looked, and found nothing on the web. The article itself was vague, evasive, and buzzwordy, and would have required a total rewrite if kept in any case. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 15:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Spammy article about what seems to me a non-notable company and, indeed, the article makes no assertion of notability. Google search for "Septier Communication"-wikipedia produces 347 returns, but apart from the company's own website these all appear to be directory entries and the like with no third party etc sources. Article was created September 2007 with no development since, by an editor who has edited only this article, plus adding the company name to Positioning (telecommunications). Emeraude ( talk) 17:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply