The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG. Unsourced for 5 years. There is a one-line mention in the antiquated A Glossary of the Tribes & Castes of the Punjab: "SEMI, a Jat clan (agricultural) found in Multan." Ignoring Wikipedia mirrors, I am not able to find any evidence of significant coverage in
reliable sources.
utcursch |
talk 17:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
utcursch |
talk 17:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 00:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as this would imaginably be notable and acceptable but with no signs of better, this is simply best deleted for now until better is available.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG. Unsourced for 5 years. There is a one-line mention in the antiquated A Glossary of the Tribes & Castes of the Punjab: "SEMI, a Jat clan (agricultural) found in Multan." Ignoring Wikipedia mirrors, I am not able to find any evidence of significant coverage in
reliable sources.
utcursch |
talk 17:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
utcursch |
talk 17:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 00:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as this would imaginably be notable and acceptable but with no signs of better, this is simply best deleted for now until better is available.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.