The result was keep all. I would, however, be open to individual nominations of the related articles for deletion. One two three... 06:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Unless we take all national-level government agencies to be notable (a position I acknowledge but don't share), then these are good candidates for deletion. Never mind the poor writing style, the WP:ENGLISH issues and, given the bureaucratese, possible copyright violations (at any rate, this is a direct copy of this). What's important is the lack of much of an attempt to even assert notability, the utter lack of references, and the lack of third-party, independent sources that might help in establishing notability. Biruitorul Talk 15:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was keep all. I would, however, be open to individual nominations of the related articles for deletion. One two three... 06:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Unless we take all national-level government agencies to be notable (a position I acknowledge but don't share), then these are good candidates for deletion. Never mind the poor writing style, the WP:ENGLISH issues and, given the bureaucratese, possible copyright violations (at any rate, this is a direct copy of this). What's important is the lack of much of an attempt to even assert notability, the utter lack of references, and the lack of third-party, independent sources that might help in establishing notability. Biruitorul Talk 15:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages: