From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele

Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In a WP:BEFORE search I could find no coverage in English or Spanish of the event claimed to be taking place in a few weeks' time. It's been draftified and redirected, but this always gets immediately reverted. Article creator was globally locked for LTA, and reversions are being done by new account and anonymously, and always without comment. Rather than continue a draftifying war, I'm bringing it here to AFD for discussion. It seems to be WP:TOOSOON at best. Wikishovel ( talk) 00:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Speedy delete under G5. The sockmaster per es.wiki block log is User:Jocer Blandino, who's also been blocked here. The most significant edits to the article have pretty much just been tags. Assuming an administrator also agrees, speedy delete without salting in case someone not block evading can make a better version. jellyfish  00:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Changing my vote here to delete per Wikishovel to prevent the treadmill! Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 10:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I too have suspected User:Jocer Blandino sock. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply
I had thought of G5, but as the chief draft-reverter looks like another sock, they'd probably just recreate it following G5, rinse, repeat. Taking it to AFD avoids that treadmill, at least. I'm no expert on Salvadoran politics, but it sounds plausible that they have multiple inauguration ceremonies following consecutive reelections, as is done in the US, Philippines, etc. So I'm in favour of holding off on G5 for now, and would prefer that someone could definitively show that there will or won't be a second inauguration. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply
I've filed over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jocer Blandino if you're at all familiar with the master here. Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 18:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Jellyfish, @ Wikishovel, SPI has confirmed sock. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete for now, per nom. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  • CU Note The two main authors were indeed socks of the same globally banned user. It would have been eligible for G5 in my view, but happy for this discussion to continue to establish a consensus on notability. Girth Summit (blether) 20:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

My final (I promise) vote after CU confirmed it was a sock - delete without prejudice to it being remade as a draft. As Wikishovel said earlier, WP:TOOSOON applies and this event could be notable if the article had any sources. Holding out hope for the best - it'll turn into a notable article when sources appear and a good editor recreates it, or it'll serve as a nice honeypot for the socks. jellyfish  21:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele

Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In a WP:BEFORE search I could find no coverage in English or Spanish of the event claimed to be taking place in a few weeks' time. It's been draftified and redirected, but this always gets immediately reverted. Article creator was globally locked for LTA, and reversions are being done by new account and anonymously, and always without comment. Rather than continue a draftifying war, I'm bringing it here to AFD for discussion. It seems to be WP:TOOSOON at best. Wikishovel ( talk) 00:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Speedy delete under G5. The sockmaster per es.wiki block log is User:Jocer Blandino, who's also been blocked here. The most significant edits to the article have pretty much just been tags. Assuming an administrator also agrees, speedy delete without salting in case someone not block evading can make a better version. jellyfish  00:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Changing my vote here to delete per Wikishovel to prevent the treadmill! Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 10:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I too have suspected User:Jocer Blandino sock. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply
I had thought of G5, but as the chief draft-reverter looks like another sock, they'd probably just recreate it following G5, rinse, repeat. Taking it to AFD avoids that treadmill, at least. I'm no expert on Salvadoran politics, but it sounds plausible that they have multiple inauguration ceremonies following consecutive reelections, as is done in the US, Philippines, etc. So I'm in favour of holding off on G5 for now, and would prefer that someone could definitively show that there will or won't be a second inauguration. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply
I've filed over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jocer Blandino if you're at all familiar with the master here. Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 18:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Jellyfish, @ Wikishovel, SPI has confirmed sock. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete for now, per nom. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  • CU Note The two main authors were indeed socks of the same globally banned user. It would have been eligible for G5 in my view, but happy for this discussion to continue to establish a consensus on notability. Girth Summit (blether) 20:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

My final (I promise) vote after CU confirmed it was a sock - delete without prejudice to it being remade as a draft. As Wikishovel said earlier, WP:TOOSOON applies and this event could be notable if the article had any sources. Holding out hope for the best - it'll turn into a notable article when sources appear and a good editor recreates it, or it'll serve as a nice honeypot for the socks. jellyfish  21:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook