The result was no consensus. There is certainly no way this can lead to a delete outcome. There is some support for merger, but this should be taken further on the talk page. Stifle ( talk) 08:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Yes, I'm a Doctor Who fan, and yes, I know what this is talking about - but I'm in bafflement as to why there is an encyclopedia entry about what is ultimately one fan's theory about a minor continuity issue (and the paltry reference bears witness to that). The fan himself actually talks about it on the talk page and is amazed himself that this article exists. The whole thing is about something that isn't real and was never made - it exists only in some Doctor Who fans heads. This article may have been there a while, but maybe it's time for some of these over-zealous fans to wake up and smell the coffee? -- Tuzapicabit ( talk) 01:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There is certainly no way this can lead to a delete outcome. There is some support for merger, but this should be taken further on the talk page. Stifle ( talk) 08:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Yes, I'm a Doctor Who fan, and yes, I know what this is talking about - but I'm in bafflement as to why there is an encyclopedia entry about what is ultimately one fan's theory about a minor continuity issue (and the paltry reference bears witness to that). The fan himself actually talks about it on the talk page and is amazed himself that this article exists. The whole thing is about something that isn't real and was never made - it exists only in some Doctor Who fans heads. This article may have been there a while, but maybe it's time for some of these over-zealous fans to wake up and smell the coffee? -- Tuzapicabit ( talk) 01:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply