The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 11:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable football league, fails WP:N and WP:NSPORTS. League was either semi-pro or minor league, both of which fail WP:NSPORTS. No independent reliable sources provided (only enthusiast websites or trivial coverage), fails WP:RS. Paul McDonald ( talk) 04:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Review of "improvements" I've got some serious questions about these improvements and comments that need to be addressed:
CONCLUSION the sportswriters of the day, the players of the day, and the team managers of the day did not see the league as notable. Why should we?-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Let's take a closer look at those:
This brings be back to the original question: "Of the articles I can read online, they all seem to be about an individual rather than about the league. For the offline references, do these suffer the same shortfall or are they truly about the league?"-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 11:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable football league, fails WP:N and WP:NSPORTS. League was either semi-pro or minor league, both of which fail WP:NSPORTS. No independent reliable sources provided (only enthusiast websites or trivial coverage), fails WP:RS. Paul McDonald ( talk) 04:03, 31 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Review of "improvements" I've got some serious questions about these improvements and comments that need to be addressed:
CONCLUSION the sportswriters of the day, the players of the day, and the team managers of the day did not see the league as notable. Why should we?-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Let's take a closer look at those:
This brings be back to the original question: "Of the articles I can read online, they all seem to be about an individual rather than about the league. For the offline references, do these suffer the same shortfall or are they truly about the league?"-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC) reply