The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was that sources in this discussion are sufficient for meeting
WP:NCORP. They remain to be added to the article.
Sea Limited (aka Sea Group) is just a non-notable parent company of Garena, which content can be mentioned at
Garena article. And the former name of Sea Limited, according to news article is Garena too.
Comment If it's really the case that Garena has been rebranded as Sea, then surely either this or the
Garena article needs to go, they can't both be about the same company, only under different names. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment ...and another thing: the holding company, if it really is only that, ie. holding and not trading, is unlikely to be notable (and no, it does not inherit notability from its subsidiaries, as has been suggested). If, however, the argument is that Sea isn't properly a holding company but rather the corporate umbrella for its various (notable or non-notable) subsidiaries, and is in fact a trading entity itself, then I think this article should stay and the subsidiary articles be merged and redirected here. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Curious about thoughts on merging!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk)
21:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was that sources in this discussion are sufficient for meeting
WP:NCORP. They remain to be added to the article.
Sea Limited (aka Sea Group) is just a non-notable parent company of Garena, which content can be mentioned at
Garena article. And the former name of Sea Limited, according to news article is Garena too.
Comment If it's really the case that Garena has been rebranded as Sea, then surely either this or the
Garena article needs to go, they can't both be about the same company, only under different names. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment ...and another thing: the holding company, if it really is only that, ie. holding and not trading, is unlikely to be notable (and no, it does not inherit notability from its subsidiaries, as has been suggested). If, however, the argument is that Sea isn't properly a holding company but rather the corporate umbrella for its various (notable or non-notable) subsidiaries, and is in fact a trading entity itself, then I think this article should stay and the subsidiary articles be merged and redirected here. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Curious about thoughts on merging!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk)
21:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.