The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: the keep !vote above is based on the fact that ScrewAttack is
part of something notable which doesn't confer notability because notability isn't inherited. A quick
source search reveals nothing other than fancruft, self-published sources and affiliated media outlets. There are no independent, reliable reviews which give any indication of the article passing
web notability standards. I am opposed to a merge because after looking at the article of the parent company, there is little sourced, encyclopedic content that can be merged. Perhaps a redirect may be the way to go but it's definitely not up to notability or verifiability standards. DrStrausstalk13:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect - To
Rooster Teeth per the reasoning of nominator and DrStrauss. There is the potential issue of confusion with the term "screw attack", so an alternative would be to redirect to
screw attack and make that a disambiguation page.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)13:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep This isn't even debatable. ScrewAttack has 3.7 Million Youtube Subscribers with more than twenty videos that have more than 10 millions views. They are currently part of the Rooster Teeth family. Not even questionable that they fall within the definition of notability for Wikipedia. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bodychecker628 (
talk •
contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: the keep !vote above is based on the fact that ScrewAttack is
part of something notable which doesn't confer notability because notability isn't inherited. A quick
source search reveals nothing other than fancruft, self-published sources and affiliated media outlets. There are no independent, reliable reviews which give any indication of the article passing
web notability standards. I am opposed to a merge because after looking at the article of the parent company, there is little sourced, encyclopedic content that can be merged. Perhaps a redirect may be the way to go but it's definitely not up to notability or verifiability standards. DrStrausstalk13:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect - To
Rooster Teeth per the reasoning of nominator and DrStrauss. There is the potential issue of confusion with the term "screw attack", so an alternative would be to redirect to
screw attack and make that a disambiguation page.ZXCVBNM (
TALK)13:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep This isn't even debatable. ScrewAttack has 3.7 Million Youtube Subscribers with more than twenty videos that have more than 10 millions views. They are currently part of the Rooster Teeth family. Not even questionable that they fall within the definition of notability for Wikipedia. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bodychecker628 (
talk •
contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.