The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
I'd come across this as a G4 speedy, but it didn't entirely qualify since the article was deleted per author request rather than through the AfD. The current version also has a slightly larger amount of info than the prior version did, so I'm taking this back to AfD since it doesn't fit cleanly under G4.
There's really no coverage out there for Weinberg and neither his time served in office or his sports career meet the requirements of WP:NFOOTY or WP:NPOLITICIAN. None of his writings seem to have gained coverage in places Wikipedia would consider reliable, so he would not qualify for WP:CREATIVE either.
I don't think you should delete this entry, Weinberg is an important voice in Jewish-Canadian literature and politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.223.160 ( talk) 00:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I need to note that this is not the same Scott Weinberg who works as a reviewer and is active in film. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
He has received notable coverage for his writing in Catholic News Service and The Boston Pilot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.223.160 ( talk) 01:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes, Catholic News Service, and the Boston Pilot are very reliable sources. The article includes citations for these including a review by theologian Eugene Fisher, a peer-reviewed scholar. The citations make it self evident that the author has been covered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.175.185.58 ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 14 May 2016
User:Sweinberg8 is not creating an autobiography. Same last name but no relation. —Preceding undated comment added 19:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
I'd come across this as a G4 speedy, but it didn't entirely qualify since the article was deleted per author request rather than through the AfD. The current version also has a slightly larger amount of info than the prior version did, so I'm taking this back to AfD since it doesn't fit cleanly under G4.
There's really no coverage out there for Weinberg and neither his time served in office or his sports career meet the requirements of WP:NFOOTY or WP:NPOLITICIAN. None of his writings seem to have gained coverage in places Wikipedia would consider reliable, so he would not qualify for WP:CREATIVE either.
I don't think you should delete this entry, Weinberg is an important voice in Jewish-Canadian literature and politics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.223.160 ( talk) 00:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I need to note that this is not the same Scott Weinberg who works as a reviewer and is active in film. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
He has received notable coverage for his writing in Catholic News Service and The Boston Pilot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.223.160 ( talk) 01:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes, Catholic News Service, and the Boston Pilot are very reliable sources. The article includes citations for these including a review by theologian Eugene Fisher, a peer-reviewed scholar. The citations make it self evident that the author has been covered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.175.185.58 ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 14 May 2016
User:Sweinberg8 is not creating an autobiography. Same last name but no relation. —Preceding undated comment added 19:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)