The result was Delete, and create Category:Chinese Tea Ceremony schools. The arguments against this article on notability grounds are compelling, and would apply equally to a list. However the same notability criteria do not as strongly apply to categories, and this suggestion by The Bushranger seems to satisfy the requirements of all parties; no non-notable article or list, but the articles in question are linked together and accessible via a common page.
The notability of the articles that now belong to the category was not a matter for discussion in this nomination. Should they subsequently be deleted and the category rendered empty, clearly it can be speedily deleted under WP:CSD#C1. waggers ( talk) 12:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC) reply
This organization does not seem notable. I can't find any good sources for it. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 04:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, and create Category:Chinese Tea Ceremony schools. The arguments against this article on notability grounds are compelling, and would apply equally to a list. However the same notability criteria do not as strongly apply to categories, and this suggestion by The Bushranger seems to satisfy the requirements of all parties; no non-notable article or list, but the articles in question are linked together and accessible via a common page.
The notability of the articles that now belong to the category was not a matter for discussion in this nomination. Should they subsequently be deleted and the category rendered empty, clearly it can be speedily deleted under WP:CSD#C1. waggers ( talk) 12:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC) reply
This organization does not seem notable. I can't find any good sources for it. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 04:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC) reply