- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 23:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Schoola
- Schoola ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Obvious undeclared commissioned work of borderline notability at best that is excluded from Wikipedia by WP:NOTSPAM and WP:YELLOWPAGES. This is nothing more than an yellow pages listing and promotional blurb. The SFChronicle coverage is pretty local and focuses on the local nature, and the Business Insider piece is mainly about the tech celebrities/business people who are helping fundraise for it. TechCrunch isn't reliable for purposes of notability, and the LA Times piece is a paid advertisement (declared on the piece). This is an attempt at native advertising and should be deleted as such. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - borderline with GNG, not too badly referenced, but clearly Native advertising. As Tony said, it is a WP:YELLOWPAGES and is not excluded from WP:NOTSPAM, so it has to be deleted. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 13:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT and block the article creator so we do not have to waste anymore of our freely given time on their paid WP:TOU violations. They are not an asset to the community. >SerialNumber 54129 ...speculates 12:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The sourcing is peripheral at best and that leaves us with an advertisement, not an article. ZettaComposer ( talk) 15:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 23:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Schoola
- Schoola ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Obvious undeclared commissioned work of borderline notability at best that is excluded from Wikipedia by WP:NOTSPAM and WP:YELLOWPAGES. This is nothing more than an yellow pages listing and promotional blurb. The SFChronicle coverage is pretty local and focuses on the local nature, and the Business Insider piece is mainly about the tech celebrities/business people who are helping fundraise for it. TechCrunch isn't reliable for purposes of notability, and the LA Times piece is a paid advertisement (declared on the piece). This is an attempt at native advertising and should be deleted as such. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - borderline with GNG, not too badly referenced, but clearly Native advertising. As Tony said, it is a WP:YELLOWPAGES and is not excluded from WP:NOTSPAM, so it has to be deleted. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 13:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT and block the article creator so we do not have to waste anymore of our freely given time on their paid WP:TOU violations. They are not an asset to the community. >SerialNumber 54129 ...speculates 12:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The sourcing is peripheral at best and that leaves us with an advertisement, not an article. ZettaComposer ( talk) 15:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.