- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MER-C 10:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Scentsy
- Scentsy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are mainly their own website or routine coverage/ explicitly disallowed under WP:NCORP (cf trivial coverage includes "inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists"). No independent indepth reliable sourcing to write an appropriate article and pass notability. I also have to say that I'm not exactly happy about advertising a multilevel marketing company (aka scam) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 14:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 14:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Leaving aside ethical questions on Multi-level marketing, my searches are finding routine announcements and a recent appearance on a mid-size employer list ( Idaho Statesman, 2 May 2018) but neither these nor the article text and sources indicate WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD ( talk) 07:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - significant coverage in independent sources just isn't forthcoming, even if the article was cleaned up to be less promotional (which it would need should it be kept). Richard 0612 09:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MER-C 10:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Scentsy
- Scentsy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are mainly their own website or routine coverage/ explicitly disallowed under WP:NCORP (cf trivial coverage includes "inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists"). No independent indepth reliable sourcing to write an appropriate article and pass notability. I also have to say that I'm not exactly happy about advertising a multilevel marketing company (aka scam) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 14:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 14:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Leaving aside ethical questions on Multi-level marketing, my searches are finding routine announcements and a recent appearance on a mid-size employer list ( Idaho Statesman, 2 May 2018) but neither these nor the article text and sources indicate WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD ( talk) 07:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - significant coverage in independent sources just isn't forthcoming, even if the article was cleaned up to be less promotional (which it would need should it be kept). Richard 0612 09:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.