From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Scandinavian Oil-Gas Magazine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After being created by a user with a likely conflict of interest in 2007, there has been minimal improvement or update, and there is no evidence of substantial coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of this magazine per WP:ORG. The only source is relatively recently added and is a LinkedIn profile, and I cannot see many others available. ~ mazca talk 15:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ~ mazca talk 15:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ~ mazca talk 15:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete the only sources are the magazine's website and its LinkedIn page, and the website was last updated in 2018. I don't see any independent coverage. There are references to it though (e.g. [1]), it certainly did exist. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 03:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 00:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Scandinavian Oil-Gas Magazine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After being created by a user with a likely conflict of interest in 2007, there has been minimal improvement or update, and there is no evidence of substantial coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of this magazine per WP:ORG. The only source is relatively recently added and is a LinkedIn profile, and I cannot see many others available. ~ mazca talk 15:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ~ mazca talk 15:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ~ mazca talk 15:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete the only sources are the magazine's website and its LinkedIn page, and the website was last updated in 2018. I don't see any independent coverage. There are references to it though (e.g. [1]), it certainly did exist. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 03:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 00:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook