The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
I had actually planned on writing an article about this subject, but I can't find any reliable third party sources at all on it, so it doesn't meet the GNG. There are two mentions of the webcomic in blog posts profiling a different work by the same artist ( [1], [2]), but that's the closest that I can get to finding sources. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 02:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Strong Delete Much as this is my favourite webcomic site, I have to admit my fairly thorough (and at the time quite indignant) search reveals that this is definitely not notable. The only saving grace I can find is that it seems to be quite well-visited, although I fail to see how that could be notability. Delete as per the nominator, great site but not notable. RailwayScientist ( talk) 21:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
I had actually planned on writing an article about this subject, but I can't find any reliable third party sources at all on it, so it doesn't meet the GNG. There are two mentions of the webcomic in blog posts profiling a different work by the same artist ( [1], [2]), but that's the closest that I can get to finding sources. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 02:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Strong Delete Much as this is my favourite webcomic site, I have to admit my fairly thorough (and at the time quite indignant) search reveals that this is definitely not notable. The only saving grace I can find is that it seems to be quite well-visited, although I fail to see how that could be notability. Delete as per the nominator, great site but not notable. RailwayScientist ( talk) 21:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)