From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Sathiyam TV (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable subject; article is mostly promo/advertising. Quis separabit? 19:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 01:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 01:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or move to List_of_Tamil-language_television_channels#News as this channel exists and has gotten some but not enough attention as shown here along with passing mentions here and here (this last one for image attribution). Considering Sathiyam tv was started in June 2013 and this current article was started shortly after, further creation with no significant improvement may require page protection and I'll add this to my watchlist. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep, the channel has received coverage for its shows, warning given by Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and for a teacher abusing a Congress MLA during one of its shows.-- Skr15081997 ( talk) 16:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Darkwind ( talk) 03:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Advertising/spam. There are undoubtedly controversies, as there would be with any Tamil language broadcaster. That should be discussed elsewhere, though. This particular "tv" having its own article, filled with links and promos, is intolerable, as that will remain in the history, and someone will always be motivated to revert back (since someone was motivated to create it, twice). Yes, current controversies with private media should get coverage, but not by granting each one a platform for advertising. Hithladaeus ( talk) 14:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Sathiyam TV (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable subject; article is mostly promo/advertising. Quis separabit? 19:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 01:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 01:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or move to List_of_Tamil-language_television_channels#News as this channel exists and has gotten some but not enough attention as shown here along with passing mentions here and here (this last one for image attribution). Considering Sathiyam tv was started in June 2013 and this current article was started shortly after, further creation with no significant improvement may require page protection and I'll add this to my watchlist. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep, the channel has received coverage for its shows, warning given by Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and for a teacher abusing a Congress MLA during one of its shows.-- Skr15081997 ( talk) 16:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Darkwind ( talk) 03:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Advertising/spam. There are undoubtedly controversies, as there would be with any Tamil language broadcaster. That should be discussed elsewhere, though. This particular "tv" having its own article, filled with links and promos, is intolerable, as that will remain in the history, and someone will always be motivated to revert back (since someone was motivated to create it, twice). Yes, current controversies with private media should get coverage, but not by granting each one a platform for advertising. Hithladaeus ( talk) 14:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook