- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 06:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Sarah Deane
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sarah Deane ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unref blp that has been in CAT:NN for over 11 years. It reads as promotion, and implies that working with notable people makes her notable. There are sources available, but not the significant coverage to meet WP:GNG or the significance of her work to meet any other aspect of notability. Boleyn ( talk) 05:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete covert advertising about a non-notable screenwriter. My BEFORE search was complicated by the appearance of multiple Sarah Deans in the search, but while some of them are plausibly notable, this one is not by a long shot. Java Hurricane 06:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Script editor and writer for a few shows - looing at her IMDB profile, at this stage of her career, seems non notable. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 06:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 06:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Sarah Deane
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sarah Deane ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unref blp that has been in CAT:NN for over 11 years. It reads as promotion, and implies that working with notable people makes her notable. There are sources available, but not the significant coverage to meet WP:GNG or the significance of her work to meet any other aspect of notability. Boleyn ( talk) 05:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete covert advertising about a non-notable screenwriter. My BEFORE search was complicated by the appearance of multiple Sarah Deans in the search, but while some of them are plausibly notable, this one is not by a long shot. Java Hurricane 06:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Script editor and writer for a few shows - looing at her IMDB profile, at this stage of her career, seems non notable. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 06:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.