The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per
WP:SNOW (six keeps with no dissent) and the likelihood that, with this starting point, continued discussion is more likely to focus on the nomination history than on the merits of the case. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
21:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Pretty extensive article for a first-year grad student. Creator argues GNG, but I don't see it in the sources. The subject clearly has potential to become notable in the future, but looks like a case of too soon for a page at the moment.
Take Note List (
talk)
17:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - yet another nomination by a new editor of one of Jesswade88's articles. Created an account, made exactly enough edits to be autoconfirmed, waited a few days, and nominated it. Are we really going to permit harassment by nomination? If an experienced editor in good standing wants to renominate, so be it. — Rhododendritestalk \\
18:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep – Disclaimer, I made this page. I'm not sure who you are
Take Note List, but please leave me alone! Focus on making Wikipedia better, not trying to take women's biographies down.
Jesswade88 (
talk)
19:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per
WP:SNOW (six keeps with no dissent) and the likelihood that, with this starting point, continued discussion is more likely to focus on the nomination history than on the merits of the case. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
21:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Pretty extensive article for a first-year grad student. Creator argues GNG, but I don't see it in the sources. The subject clearly has potential to become notable in the future, but looks like a case of too soon for a page at the moment.
Take Note List (
talk)
17:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - yet another nomination by a new editor of one of Jesswade88's articles. Created an account, made exactly enough edits to be autoconfirmed, waited a few days, and nominated it. Are we really going to permit harassment by nomination? If an experienced editor in good standing wants to renominate, so be it. — Rhododendritestalk \\
18:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep – Disclaimer, I made this page. I'm not sure who you are
Take Note List, but please leave me alone! Focus on making Wikipedia better, not trying to take women's biographies down.
Jesswade88 (
talk)
19:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.