The result was keep. No one is actually arguing for deletion here. ( non-admin closure) Tim Song ( talk) 00:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced BLP. Article was proposed for deletion on 13 February by User:Newt Winkler with the concern, "BLP, no sources, non-notable". This was contested by User:Standard Operating Procedure with the edit summary, "undo edit by sock of banned user". Prod was again added by User:Gene Omission on 25 February with the concern, "unsourced BLP, no references, previous PROD deleted by banned user".
Both Newt Winkler and Standard Operating Procedure are indefinitely blocked as sock puppets.
I am neutral to deletion. Cnilep ( talk) 17:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No one is actually arguing for deletion here. ( non-admin closure) Tim Song ( talk) 00:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced BLP. Article was proposed for deletion on 13 February by User:Newt Winkler with the concern, "BLP, no sources, non-notable". This was contested by User:Standard Operating Procedure with the edit summary, "undo edit by sock of banned user". Prod was again added by User:Gene Omission on 25 February with the concern, "unsourced BLP, no references, previous PROD deleted by banned user".
Both Newt Winkler and Standard Operating Procedure are indefinitely blocked as sock puppets.
I am neutral to deletion. Cnilep ( talk) 17:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC) reply