The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No RS online. Based on a single ref. Been an orphan since 2016. Not inherently notable. Written like an ad. Speedy deleteVikram Vincent 14:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution, which consensus has been to keep. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)reply
This is a private institution without any inherent notability. The
typical outcomes from previous discussions about average articles on this subject are
not binding on this one and may not be relevant to this particular article. Please consider adding your opinion about whether this specific subject meets any relevant
notability guideline.
Not sure where you get that from. We have never treated private colleges any differently from public ones. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 16:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Peer
WP:NORG, along with similar AfDs that resulted in the articles being deleted, an article about a private college has to pass the notability guidelines the same way any other organization does. By having enough adequate sources to make it notable. This college doesn't have the required sourcing for it to be notable though. So, there's no guideline based reason to keep the article. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 07:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom: There are no reliable sources to establish notability.
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 14:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No RS online. Based on a single ref. Been an orphan since 2016. Not inherently notable. Written like an ad. Speedy deleteVikram Vincent 14:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution, which consensus has been to keep. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)reply
This is a private institution without any inherent notability. The
typical outcomes from previous discussions about average articles on this subject are
not binding on this one and may not be relevant to this particular article. Please consider adding your opinion about whether this specific subject meets any relevant
notability guideline.
Not sure where you get that from. We have never treated private colleges any differently from public ones. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 16:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Peer
WP:NORG, along with similar AfDs that resulted in the articles being deleted, an article about a private college has to pass the notability guidelines the same way any other organization does. By having enough adequate sources to make it notable. This college doesn't have the required sourcing for it to be notable though. So, there's no guideline based reason to keep the article. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 07:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom: There are no reliable sources to establish notability.
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 14:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.