The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I've done a fair amount of digging and I can find no evidence this person is notable and while they may have done some voice work, it appears that they've done so
as self published voice work and was not solicited or selected by any studios - I can't find any truly reliable sources (not even non-RS like iMDB!) reporting on his dubbing.
Praxidicae (
talk) 18:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)reply
I take that back, I did find
this and
this but nothing truly substantial.
Praxidicae (
talk) 18:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete I've got to question that even if they've done dubbing work on multiple films, this isn't
WP:NACTOR stuff, it's dubbing. Unless there are good sources ON THIS PERSON, not on the film they've dubbed, they probably aren't meeting notability requirements. There are a fair number of articles on voice actors who do dubbing and it feels like there is some promotional / UPE editing happening around this industry. Ravensfire (
talk) 17:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment. While this person has a lot of credits listed, a quick Google search brings up only some minor sources such as a YouTube interview. Voice of Ben 10 in Hindi is notable! A little more research would be needed. So I am undecided if this should stay or not. If it stays, it definitely needs to have some reliable references.--
AfPEN (
talk) 14:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)reply
If you're talking about the same youtube videos I came across, they're self published and do not indicate in any way that he did anything more than what I indicated in the nom, which is basically the equivalent of self-publishing.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. I am sure there are camera operators who can claim an impressive list of WP-notable films they worked on, but without GNG, they don’t get WP articles. The lack of refs in the article tells the story. I could find zero WP:SIGCOV in a good RS on this subject (explains why their core BIO details are non-existent). The extensive list of films clearly raises COI-UDP issues as well.
Britishfinance (
talk) 13:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I've done a fair amount of digging and I can find no evidence this person is notable and while they may have done some voice work, it appears that they've done so
as self published voice work and was not solicited or selected by any studios - I can't find any truly reliable sources (not even non-RS like iMDB!) reporting on his dubbing.
Praxidicae (
talk) 18:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)reply
I take that back, I did find
this and
this but nothing truly substantial.
Praxidicae (
talk) 18:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete I've got to question that even if they've done dubbing work on multiple films, this isn't
WP:NACTOR stuff, it's dubbing. Unless there are good sources ON THIS PERSON, not on the film they've dubbed, they probably aren't meeting notability requirements. There are a fair number of articles on voice actors who do dubbing and it feels like there is some promotional / UPE editing happening around this industry. Ravensfire (
talk) 17:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment. While this person has a lot of credits listed, a quick Google search brings up only some minor sources such as a YouTube interview. Voice of Ben 10 in Hindi is notable! A little more research would be needed. So I am undecided if this should stay or not. If it stays, it definitely needs to have some reliable references.--
AfPEN (
talk) 14:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)reply
If you're talking about the same youtube videos I came across, they're self published and do not indicate in any way that he did anything more than what I indicated in the nom, which is basically the equivalent of self-publishing.
Praxidicae (
talk) 15:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. I am sure there are camera operators who can claim an impressive list of WP-notable films they worked on, but without GNG, they don’t get WP articles. The lack of refs in the article tells the story. I could find zero WP:SIGCOV in a good RS on this subject (explains why their core BIO details are non-existent). The extensive list of films clearly raises COI-UDP issues as well.
Britishfinance (
talk) 13:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.