- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. North America 1000 06:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sanjerwas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have no issue with recreating this given decent information, but what we have is a bad case of an unverifiable geostub, and given the problems we've had with those, it needs to go as it stands. I could not identify it with any place on a map, for starters. Mangoe ( talk) 02:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India. North America 1000 03:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, and I hope you withdraw this nomination, as it appears to me to be a failure of BEFORE. As much as I hate geostubs, it meets GEOLAND as a legally-recognized populated place. The 2011 Census of India website is permadead, but Census2011.co.in, although blacklisted, replicates the actual census data accurately and IMO is a useful substitute until we get Census 2022. If you search Sanjerwas on that site, it comes up as a village in Dadri tehsil of Bhiwani district. In 2016, Dadri tehsil was upgraded to a district, Charkhi Dadri district, taking all its villages with it. The name Sanjerwas also comes up on a bunch of historical censuses if you search GBooks. I've no idea how you couldn't identify it on a map - it comes right up under a slight variant spelling (Sanjarwas vs Sanjerwas - these slight differences are extremely common with Indian village name transliterations) when I search GMaps, right next to Phogat (see [1]). It's also listed on the official map for the district on the district's website. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep but rename to Sanjarwas. Meets
WP:GEOLAND as a populated, legally-recognised place. As shown above the village is listed on the Charkhi Dadri district map and is also on Google Maps under the name of Sanjarwas.
AusLondonder (
talk)
16:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, it should be with the E - that's the spelling on the Census. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per PMC. Meets GEOLAND as a populated and legally-recognized place -- Ab207 ( talk) 16:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. North America 1000 06:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sanjerwas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have no issue with recreating this given decent information, but what we have is a bad case of an unverifiable geostub, and given the problems we've had with those, it needs to go as it stands. I could not identify it with any place on a map, for starters. Mangoe ( talk) 02:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India. North America 1000 03:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, and I hope you withdraw this nomination, as it appears to me to be a failure of BEFORE. As much as I hate geostubs, it meets GEOLAND as a legally-recognized populated place. The 2011 Census of India website is permadead, but Census2011.co.in, although blacklisted, replicates the actual census data accurately and IMO is a useful substitute until we get Census 2022. If you search Sanjerwas on that site, it comes up as a village in Dadri tehsil of Bhiwani district. In 2016, Dadri tehsil was upgraded to a district, Charkhi Dadri district, taking all its villages with it. The name Sanjerwas also comes up on a bunch of historical censuses if you search GBooks. I've no idea how you couldn't identify it on a map - it comes right up under a slight variant spelling (Sanjarwas vs Sanjerwas - these slight differences are extremely common with Indian village name transliterations) when I search GMaps, right next to Phogat (see [1]). It's also listed on the official map for the district on the district's website. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep but rename to Sanjarwas. Meets
WP:GEOLAND as a populated, legally-recognised place. As shown above the village is listed on the Charkhi Dadri district map and is also on Google Maps under the name of Sanjarwas.
AusLondonder (
talk)
16:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, it should be with the E - that's the spelling on the Census. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per PMC. Meets GEOLAND as a populated and legally-recognized place -- Ab207 ( talk) 16:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.