- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sandra Overlack ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly fails WP:NPOL Heideneii ( talk) 07:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 29. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – this is by and large the classic scenario of nearly all relevant coverage being mainly about the org itself rather than the person, and
WP:PASSING applies. Similarly to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Loeper, I'd normally be inclined to !vote redirect, but the former at least co-chairs his party, while Overlack
co-founded a regional branch of the Klimaliste political association in Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg along with 24 others
. Add to that her withdrawal from politics in January (per her LinkedIn, she's now an "HR & Operations Manager"), and I think outright deletion makes the most sense. AngryHarpy talk 11:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- thanks for putting salt in the wound :D
- As for the other article you mentioned, I disagree and look at TAZ, Le Figaro and Volkskrant in addition to various local articles, but I'm with you on this one, as even the local coverage is primarily about the party. -- Heideneii ( talk) 16:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
*Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions.
Sennecaster (
Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Striking; I removed from the delsort due to not being conservatism.
Sennecaster (
Chat)
13:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 14:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
08:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Low profile individual, lack of sources, and I was unable to identify a rational merge or redirect target.— S Marshall T/ C 15:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sandra Overlack ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly fails WP:NPOL Heideneii ( talk) 07:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 29. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – this is by and large the classic scenario of nearly all relevant coverage being mainly about the org itself rather than the person, and
WP:PASSING applies. Similarly to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Loeper, I'd normally be inclined to !vote redirect, but the former at least co-chairs his party, while Overlack
co-founded a regional branch of the Klimaliste political association in Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg along with 24 others
. Add to that her withdrawal from politics in January (per her LinkedIn, she's now an "HR & Operations Manager"), and I think outright deletion makes the most sense. AngryHarpy talk 11:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- thanks for putting salt in the wound :D
- As for the other article you mentioned, I disagree and look at TAZ, Le Figaro and Volkskrant in addition to various local articles, but I'm with you on this one, as even the local coverage is primarily about the party. -- Heideneii ( talk) 16:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
*Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions.
Sennecaster (
Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Striking; I removed from the delsort due to not being conservatism.
Sennecaster (
Chat)
13:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 14:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
08:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Low profile individual, lack of sources, and I was unable to identify a rational merge or redirect target.— S Marshall T/ C 15:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.