From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply

San Antonio Circuit

San Antonio Circuit (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not establish a claim to notability under the WP:GNG standard for the concept that this collection of roads has this status. The underlying roads may be notable as individual state highways (per years of precedent noted at WP:ROADOUTCOMES), but without the "significant coverage in multiple, independent, third-party sources" to establish the notability of the concept, and notability cannot be inherited (per WP:NOTINHERITED) from the underlying highways. As it is, this article relies solely on a WP:SPS to establish the existence of the concept.

This is a contested PROD that was contested by the article creator who erroneously thinks that he has to be the one who published the source for it to be self-published. Imzadi 1979  21:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Strong delete. The sourcing provided does not come anywhere close to meeting WP:RS. Ultimately, there is zero evidence to corroborate the statement that this "unofficial" beltway is "widely known among locals" (as someone who lives in San Antonio, I can say it's not), and thus this violates WP:V. -- Kinu  t/ c 23:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Multiple searches found nothing and that included News, Books and browser. I live in Texas as well but not San Antonio but I can say this road is not significant or notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC) reply

San Antonio Circuit

San Antonio Circuit (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not establish a claim to notability under the WP:GNG standard for the concept that this collection of roads has this status. The underlying roads may be notable as individual state highways (per years of precedent noted at WP:ROADOUTCOMES), but without the "significant coverage in multiple, independent, third-party sources" to establish the notability of the concept, and notability cannot be inherited (per WP:NOTINHERITED) from the underlying highways. As it is, this article relies solely on a WP:SPS to establish the existence of the concept.

This is a contested PROD that was contested by the article creator who erroneously thinks that he has to be the one who published the source for it to be self-published. Imzadi 1979  21:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Strong delete. The sourcing provided does not come anywhere close to meeting WP:RS. Ultimately, there is zero evidence to corroborate the statement that this "unofficial" beltway is "widely known among locals" (as someone who lives in San Antonio, I can say it's not), and thus this violates WP:V. -- Kinu  t/ c 23:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Multiple searches found nothing and that included News, Books and browser. I live in Texas as well but not San Antonio but I can say this road is not significant or notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook