From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Samsung SPH-A900

Samsung SPH-A900 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another cellphone that probably cannot be meaningfully said to have made history. Article has been unsourced for 11 years, and for 5 has been marked as such. No evidence of notability has been established in that time. — Keφr 13:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Non-notable cellphone with no coverage. SL93 ( talk) 22:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 04:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Samsung SPH-A900

Samsung SPH-A900 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another cellphone that probably cannot be meaningfully said to have made history. Article has been unsourced for 11 years, and for 5 has been marked as such. No evidence of notability has been established in that time. — Keφr 13:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Non-notable cellphone with no coverage. SL93 ( talk) 22:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook